
Written by
Chris Pitchford
Reading time
5 min read

TL;DR: KPIs measure whether your business is healthy. OKRs drive the specific changes you need to make it healthier. You need both: but they do different jobs. The real failure mode isn't picking the wrong one; it's using the wrong one for the wrong purpose, then wondering why nothing moves.
Key Takeaways
KPIs are health monitors. They tell you if something is wrong. They don't tell you how to fix it.
OKRs are change vehicles. They define the specific outcome you're driving toward and how you'll know you got there.
You need both. KPIs flag the problem. OKRs define the response.
The most common mistake: turning KPIs into OKRs. "Maintain NPS above 45" is not an OKR: it's a KPI threshold.
OKRs go stale without a system. 90% of US enterprises miss their annual goals: not because the goals were wrong, but because no one was watching them after week 3.
What's a KPI?
A KPI (Key Performance Indicator) is a metric that tells you whether a critical part of your business is functioning within acceptable parameters. It answers the question: are we healthy right now?
KPIs are steady-state. You track them continuously, quarter after quarter. They don't change unless your business model changes. Good KPIs for a VP of Operations might include: gross margin, headcount efficiency, meeting action item closure rate, or system uptime. If any of these drops out of range, you have a problem to diagnose.
The key word is indicator: a KPI tells you something is wrong. It doesn't tell you what to do about it.
KPI characteristics:
Tracked continuously, not just during a specific initiative
Threshold-based (you want them in a range, not necessarily maximized)
Lagging: they reflect what already happened
Stable across quarters unless the business fundamentally changes
What's an OKR?
An OKR (Objective + Key Results) is a goal structure designed to drive deliberate change. It answers a different question: what specific outcome are we trying to create, and how will we know we got there?
An Objective is a qualitative, inspiring direction: "Make our onboarding process the fastest in the category." Key Results are the measurable proof that you got there: reduce time-to-first-value from 14 days to 4 days, hit 85% onboarding completion rate, achieve NPS of 52+ at 30-day mark.
OKRs are time-boxed (typically quarterly), stretch-oriented (you should be slightly uncomfortable with them), and owned by a specific team or person. They're not a health check: they're a bet on a specific outcome.
OKR characteristics:
Time-boxed (quarterly is standard)
Aspirational: designed to stretch, not just maintain
Outcome-focused, not output-focused
Owned by someone who can actually influence the result
KPI vs OKR: side-by-side
Dimension | KPI | OKR |
|---|---|---|
Purpose | Monitor health | Drive change |
Time horizon | Continuous | Quarterly (time-boxed) |
Question answered | Are we healthy? | What are we changing? |
Example | Monthly churn rate < 2% | Reduce enterprise churn from 4% to 1.8% by Q3 |
What triggers action | Drops below threshold | Falling behind on Key Results |
Who owns it | Function/team | Named individual |
How often reviewed | Weekly dashboards | Weekly check-ins + quarterly review |
Changes over time | Rarely (stable metrics) | Every quarter (new priorities) |
The most common mistake: KPIs dressed up as OKRs
This is where most companies go wrong. They set an OKR that looks like this:
Objective: Maintain strong customer satisfaction KR1: Keep NPS above 45 KR2: Keep support ticket resolution time under 4 hours KR3: Maintain CSAT score above 4.2
That's not an OKR. That's a KPI dashboard with an Objective header stapled to it. Nothing in that set of goals drives change: it just monitors the status quo.
A real OKR for the same team might look like:
Objective: Make our onboarding the reason customers renew, not just a starting point KR1: Increase 90-day product adoption (3+ features used) from 34% to 60% KR2: Reduce time-to-first-value from 14 days to 5 days KR3: Achieve onboarding NPS of 55+ (current: 38)
The difference: the first set tracks what you already have. The second set forces you to build something you don't have yet.
When to use KPIs
Use KPIs for anything you need to monitor continuously regardless of your current strategic priorities:
Financial health (gross margin, burn, ARR growth rate)
Operational efficiency (meeting action item closure, on-time delivery, system uptime)
Customer health (churn, NRR, CSAT, support SLA compliance)
Team health (eNPS, attrition rate, hiring velocity)
KPIs should live in a dashboard that someone reviews weekly. When one drops out of range, it triggers an investigation: and potentially a new OKR to fix the underlying problem.
When to use OKRs
Use OKRs when you have a specific outcome you need to drive that requires deliberate, coordinated effort across a team:
You're entering a new market and need to build pipeline in a specific segment
Your onboarding is broken and you need to fix it this quarter
Your data infrastructure is slowing the team down and you need to modernize it
You've identified that cross-functional alignment is the biggest drag on execution
OKRs are how you say "this specific thing needs to change this quarter, and here's exactly what success looks like." They're not a home for everything: 3–5 OKRs per team per quarter is the right ceiling.
Why both frameworks fail without a live system
Here's the honest problem: both KPIs and OKRs require someone to keep them current. KPIs need someone to pull data into dashboards. OKRs need teams to check in on progress weekly.
At a 200–1,000-person company, that work typically falls on a Chief of Staff, VP of Operations, or BizOps lead. They spend hours every week chasing status updates, reformatting spreadsheets, and prepping review decks: just to tell leadership what already happened.
That's the operational layer: the tracking, review prep, and status-chasing that keeps strategy connected to execution. Today it's done manually. Brev's Goal Agents run it automatically: keeping OKRs current from the tools teams already use (Slack, Jira, Linear, Salesforce, GitHub), surfacing what's at risk before it's too late, and prepping the review so the CoS isn't rebuilding a spreadsheet on Thursday night.
The goal isn't a better framework. It's a system that makes the framework work without someone babysitting it.
Practical setup: how to run KPIs and OKRs together
Define your company KPI set (10–15 metrics max). These go in your weekly operating dashboard and get reviewed in your WBR.
Set quarterly OKRs based on where you're below benchmark or where you've identified a strategic opportunity. The KPI gap → the OKR target.
Assign clear ownership. Every OKR has one name on it. Every KPI has one owner who explains the variance when it moves.
Check OKRs weekly. Not a full meeting: a 10-minute async update from each owner on status, blockers, and confidence.
Review KPIs in your WBR. Spend 30% of the meeting on what's red and what you're doing about it.
Let KPI drops create new OKRs. If gross retention drops two quarters in a row, that's not a KPI problem anymore: it's an OKR problem that needs a dedicated initiative.
See also
Written by Chris Pitchford, Co-founder of Brev | Former VP Sales, Ally.io (acquired by Microsoft as Viva Goals)

Stay in the loop
Get execution insights, product updates, and OKR playbook, delivered to your inbox.
FAQ
Can a KPI become an OKR?
How many OKRs should a team have?
Should every department set OKRs?
What's the difference between a Key Result and a task?
You may also like these
Related Posts



